Intake answers 24 hours a day

Hablamos español

No fee unless we win

What we actually did, not what we were paid

Most injury firms lead with numbers. We do not publish any, because a figure from someone else's case tells you nothing reliable about yours. Here is the work instead.

Illustrative sample matters written for this demo website. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and nothing here is legal advice.

A woman writing at her desk in a professional office with legal books and an American flag.

Our policy on numbers

We publish no figures. Here is why.

We publish no numbers. Every outcome on this page is described as problem, approach and result, with no settlement figure, verdict figure or recovery range, because a number from someone else's case tells you nothing reliable about yours. These summaries are illustrative sample content for this demo site. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

12 matters

Problem, approach, outcome

  • Wrongful DeathTried to verdict · 2025

    Commercial van runs a red light on NW 27th Avenue

    Problem
    A father of three was killed by a delivery van. The carrier's position was that the light had just changed and that the decedent entered the intersection late.
    Approach
    We subpoenaed signal timing data from the county, matched it against a transit bus forward camera, and pulled the driver's duty records, which showed fourteen hours on duty.
    Outcome
    Liability was conceded during trial and the estate resolved the claim against the carrier and its excess insurer together.
  • Car AccidentTried to verdict · 2025

    Distracted driver rear-ends stopped traffic on I-95

    Problem
    A school teacher sustained a traumatic brain injury. The defence characterised it as a low impact crash on top of a pre-existing headache history.
    Approach
    We obtained the defendant's phone records and cell site data, paired them with the event data recorder, and retained a neuropsychologist to document deficits the imaging did not show.
    Outcome
    A Miami-Dade jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff on liability and damages, assigning the defendant the entire share of fault on the verdict form.
  • Slip & FallResolved in litigation · 2025

    Unmarked spill in a Doral supermarket aisle

    Problem
    A sixty-seven year old shopper needed a hip replacement. The store denied any knowledge of the spill.
    Approach
    We demanded the sweep logs and the prior incident history for that store. The logs showed a two hour gap in inspections and three earlier falls in the same aisle.
    Outcome
    Constructive notice was established on the documents alone and the carrier resolved the claim before depositions closed.
  • Car AccidentResolved in litigation · 2025

    Rideshare passenger injured in a Wynwood T-bone crash

    Problem
    A passenger needed shoulder and neck surgery, and the rideshare company and the driver's personal carrier each pointed at the other.
    Approach
    We pulled the trip log to fix the app period at the moment of impact, which determined which layer of the transportation network company policy applied, and pursued the at-fault driver's policy in parallel.
    Outcome
    Both layers contributed, and the passenger's own uninsured motorist coverage was opened as a third layer only after written consent from that carrier.
  • Truck AccidentResolved in litigation · 2024

    Tractor-trailer lane change on Florida's Turnpike

    Problem
    An electrician needed a spinal fusion and finished with permanent lifting restrictions. The motor carrier blamed a phantom vehicle no other witness saw.
    Approach
    A spoliation letter went out in week one. Electronic logging device data and dispatch messages established an hours of service violation and contradicted the driver's written statement.
    Outcome
    The carrier withdrew the phantom vehicle defence and the case resolved at mediation, with a funded vocational retraining plan built into the resolution.
  • Motorcycle AccidentResolved in litigation · 2024

    SUV turns left across a rider's path on Biscayne Boulevard

    Problem
    A rider suffered a femur fracture and nerve damage. The driver reported that the motorcycle was speeding with no headlight on.
    Approach
    Intersection video recovered before the thirty day overwrite showed the headlight lit and the SUV turning across a solid green. A reconstruction engineer placed the rider inside the speed limit.
    Outcome
    The comparative fault argument was abandoned and the claim resolved against the driver's carrier and then the rider's own uninsured motorist carrier, in that order.
  • Dog BiteResolved before suit · 2024

    Neighbour's dog attacks a child in Kendall

    Problem
    A child needed plastic surgery for facial lacerations. The owner had no renter's policy, and the family did not want to sue a neighbour.
    Approach
    We traced coverage to the landlord, who had written notice of the dog's earlier aggression, and brought in a plastic surgeon to project the revision procedures the child would need at skeletal maturity.
    Outcome
    The claim resolved against the landlord's carrier with the future scar revision care accounted for. The neighbour paid nothing personally.
  • Slip & FallResolved before suit · 2024

    Broken stair edge in a Miami Beach hotel

    Problem
    A visitor fractured an ankle and needed surgery. The hotel argued the guest was distracted and that the stair nosing was within tolerance.
    Approach
    Prior guest complaints obtained in discovery established notice, and a building code consultant measured the nosing against the applicable edition of the code.
    Outcome
    The distraction defence was dropped and the claim resolved before trial. The stair was rebuilt during the litigation.
  • Medical MalpracticeResolved before suit · 2023

    Emergency department misses stroke symptoms

    Problem
    A patient was discharged with a migraine diagnosis and returned nineteen hours later with a completed stroke.
    Approach
    Our nurse-attorney reconstructed the chart audit trail and showed the triage note had been amended after the return visit. Two board-certified emergency physicians supported the pre-suit notice.
    Outcome
    The hospital resolved the claim inside the statutory pre-suit period and revised its posterior circulation triage protocol.
  • Workers' CompensationResolved in litigation · 2023

    Scaffolding collapse at a Brickell high-rise site

    Problem
    An injured worker was told workers' compensation was his only remedy, and his wage benefits were about to stop.
    Approach
    We restarted the wage benefits by petition, then identified the scaffolding subcontractor as a third party outside the exclusive remedy and filed a separate negligence action.
    Outcome
    Benefits resumed and the third party action resolved separately. The comp carrier's equitable distribution claim was negotiated down before disbursement.
  • Wrongful DeathResolved in litigation · 2023

    Pool drowning at a condominium complex

    Problem
    A family lost a child at an association pool. The association said the gate met code at the time it was installed.
    Approach
    Board minutes and work orders showed residents had reported the broken self-latching gate for months. We retained an aquatic safety expert on barrier standards.
    Outcome
    The association's primary and excess carriers both participated in the resolution, and the association replaced the barrier system.
  • Truck AccidentTried to verdict · 2022

    Dump truck brake failure on the Palmetto Expressway

    Problem
    The carrier treated the crash as a sudden mechanical failure with no notice and therefore nobody's fault.
    Approach
    Maintenance records produced in discovery showed the same brake defect reported twice by two different drivers and never repaired.
    Outcome
    The jury found for the plaintiff. The court let the negligent maintenance claim go to the jury alongside vicarious liability.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Nothing on this site is legal advice. Every matter depends on its own facts, its own evidence and its own available insurance.

Someone picks up, at any hour

Say what happened. We will tell you if you have a case.

(305) 555-0158

Free and confidential. Hablamos español. No fee unless we win.

Rather write it down? Send a free case review request, or email the intake team.

Cookie preferences

Choose which cookies you allow. You can change this at any time from the link in the footer.